▲ 52 ▼ why are there no active casual conversation communities? (feddit.org) submitted 3 months ago by gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments like, i'm just trying to post random content. normally i post stuff to /c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone but this topic feels more mature, less silly. /c/casualconversation@piefed.social only has like 15 votes per post so it's not very active. meanwhile /c/asklemmy@lemmy.world has more like 70 upvotes per post on average. why is the casual conversations community so inactive?
[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 child) !dullsters@dullsters.net And !dull_mens_club@lemmy.world Are pretty active permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org [S] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children) i see, however it's not dull at all. i'm writing a book about the basics of biology. (genetics/biochemistry). i'd like some feedback :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago That sounds pretty damn dull to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Dullness is relaive and entirely subjective. As long as the content you're writing isn't too opaque to the non-science reader, I think it will fly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AskewLord@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) the place for that is among biologists, not random internet strangers. you looking in the wrong place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org [S] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children) i see, however it's not dull at all. i'm writing a book about the basics of biology. (genetics/biochemistry). i'd like some feedback :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago That sounds pretty damn dull to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Dullness is relaive and entirely subjective. As long as the content you're writing isn't too opaque to the non-science reader, I think it will fly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AskewLord@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) the place for that is among biologists, not random internet strangers. you looking in the wrong place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago That sounds pretty damn dull to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago Dullness is relaive and entirely subjective. As long as the content you're writing isn't too opaque to the non-science reader, I think it will fly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) the place for that is among biologists, not random internet strangers. you looking in the wrong place. permalink fedilink source parent