I know this is a bold thesis. It is meant to provoke thought and encourage debate. Here are some of the considerations that led me to it:

  • Europe depends on US military protection, and the US uses this “alliance” as leverage -> NATO gives Washington structural influence over European security choices.

  • US tech firms dominate Europe’s cloud and software stack, creating digital dependency. Also, European data often sits under infrastructure exposed to US legal and corporate power.

  • Russian energy dependence was a problem for Europe when the Ukraine war started. The US were quite eager when it came to "help" by replacing the Russian energy dependence with American energy dependence.

  • US sanctions policy often forces Europe to absorb costs for Washington’s geopolitical priorities.

  • American platforms shape European speech, commerce, administration, and most importantly: public debate.

  • “Strategic autonomy” exists as a slogan because dependency is already the default.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I think they're more like petulant toddlers than bulletproof teenagers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    petulant toddlers

    Nah that just the orange clown and some of his figurines around him.

    But there are others too! Seriously dark and strong ones in the background.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Sure

    Everyone knows that the real power is in the background

    But the average 'Murican isn't an edgy teen, they're an idiot toddler finger-painting with their own shit

    It's going to get worse when the edgy-teen phase kicks in because the destruction won't be wanton, it'll be wilful

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago

    the orange clown was elected TWICE by the American people.

    The system made him the winner, but i believe he lost popular vote both times and also a huge portion of the nation didn't vote at all. Sure that also says something about the people of the nation but i think it is fair to to distinguish between a 'a regime and the people and companies that support that' vs 'a national entity including all it's people and history'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    So they have elected themselves a petulant toddler. So what.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments