▲ 1156 ▼ Is this legit? (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 months ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 149 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (1 child) It sickens me right but there are youtubers out there, small ones, who just record themselves scrolling through a chatgpt response and talking about it to the camera . Bro just tsll me what you asked it and i'll get almost the same responss permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rod_Orm@piefed.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 child) What? That useless So that youtuber try answering question with chatgpt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* Here's the main channel i'm thinking of, i think i've seen it with mutltiple now - Adrian Fort Also one that's a bit Elon Musk Shill-ey He's basically using it to confirm his biases It sucks because i subscribed after seeing a higher quality talk to camera video from him which didn't use chatgpt. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Davel23@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago I initially read that as "God gives..." and it works either way. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago Jamie, pull that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Is that why they do that? I'm sure there's an ASCII character that looks like the lower case "o". It would be hilarious to set up an LLM that responds on twitter to that malformed "@Grok" with otherwise bizarre answers. Well, more bizarre than Grok normally answers in its hallucinatory state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago Honestly you could probably do that with a way lighter model than any actual chatbot and just have it return some relevant section from the uncyclopedia permalink fedilink source parent [–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago They think grok is Jamie. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* Sorry Jaimie, you're out of a job now. Technology is AmAZinG! permalink fedilink source parent [–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago That’s kinda worth stealing a bit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (1 child) It sickens me right but there are youtubers out there, small ones, who just record themselves scrolling through a chatgpt response and talking about it to the camera . Bro just tsll me what you asked it and i'll get almost the same responss permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Rod_Orm@piefed.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 child) What? That useless So that youtuber try answering question with chatgpt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* Here's the main channel i'm thinking of, i think i've seen it with mutltiple now - Adrian Fort Also one that's a bit Elon Musk Shill-ey He's basically using it to confirm his biases It sucks because i subscribed after seeing a higher quality talk to camera video from him which didn't use chatgpt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rod_Orm@piefed.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 child) What? That useless So that youtuber try answering question with chatgpt? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* Here's the main channel i'm thinking of, i think i've seen it with mutltiple now - Adrian Fort Also one that's a bit Elon Musk Shill-ey He's basically using it to confirm his biases It sucks because i subscribed after seeing a higher quality talk to camera video from him which didn't use chatgpt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* Here's the main channel i'm thinking of, i think i've seen it with mutltiple now - Adrian Fort Also one that's a bit Elon Musk Shill-ey He's basically using it to confirm his biases It sucks because i subscribed after seeing a higher quality talk to camera video from him which didn't use chatgpt. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago I initially read that as "God gives..." and it works either way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago Jamie, pull that up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 child) Is that why they do that? I'm sure there's an ASCII character that looks like the lower case "o". It would be hilarious to set up an LLM that responds on twitter to that malformed "@Grok" with otherwise bizarre answers. Well, more bizarre than Grok normally answers in its hallucinatory state. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago Honestly you could probably do that with a way lighter model than any actual chatbot and just have it return some relevant section from the uncyclopedia permalink fedilink source parent
[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago Honestly you could probably do that with a way lighter model than any actual chatbot and just have it return some relevant section from the uncyclopedia permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago They think grok is Jamie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* Sorry Jaimie, you're out of a job now. Technology is AmAZinG! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago That’s kinda worth stealing a bit permalink fedilink source parent
