cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/51582076

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/51581549

Experts are warning that China’s recently launched Global Governance Initiative (GGI) represents a threat to developing nations by promoting authoritarianism through digital surveillance and repression.

The adoption of “techno-authoritarianism,” defined as the use of digital information technology by governments to surveil, repress, and manipulate populations, poses significant risks to African nations, primarily by undermining democratic processes, human rights and long-term political stability.

Retired Col. DCS Mayal, a former intelligence officer in the Indian Army, noted a severe lack of transparency that pervades China’s governance model, saying that the initiative transforms soft power into “invisible sharp edges.”

“GGI strategies cultivate Global South dependencies, implant pervasive intelligence networks, and normalise Chinese norms,” he wrote in an April 13 brief for the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation.

He added: “Beijing promotes norms that legitimise state-level surveillance infrastructure, while positioning Chinese technological standards as globally accepted models.”

...

As a policy framework, China’s new initiative seeks to restructure international affairs in its favor by attempting to change multilateral international institutions like the United Nations. However, experts say its goal is to replace global structures with a China-centric model that prioritizes the ruling regime’s power over established African democratic norms.

...

China has provided significant infrastructure funding on the [African] continent in recent years, but many African nations are struggling with enormous loan repayments. Politicians in some countries, such as Kenya and Angola, have expressed concern that China has created financial dependency and potentially could seize strategic assets in their countries. The security governance models that China pushes also have raised concerns that they undermine the principle of an apolitical military and seek to empowerauthoritarian-leaning ruling parties on the continent.

“By using the military to decimate the opposition, ruling parties in some sub-Saharan African countries have effectively created one-party states,” Africa-China blogger Amodani Gariba told The Africa Center for Strategic Studies in 2025. “Though the economic cooperation China has with Africa has had a tremendous impact on Africans, China’s ambitions to extend its ties into military cooperation could worsen the already bad governance situation on the continent.”

...

Web Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 69 points 5 months ago* (14 children)

Experts are warning

What experts? Do these experts have any links to DC think tanks or neoconservative orgs?

Retired Col. DCS Mayal, a former intelligence officer in the Indian Army

They have got to be joking

Africa-China blogger Amodani Gariba told The Africa Center for Strategic Studies in 2025...

Africa Center for Strategic Studies? I wonder what their deal is

The Africa Center for Strategic Studies (ACSS) is self-described as "a U.S. Department of Defense institution established and funded by Congress for the study of security issues relating to Africa and serving as a forum for bilateral and multilateral research, communication, and exchange of ideas involving military and civilian participants."

lmao the fuckin gall of these people is incredible, government-sponsored "bloggers" are now the caliber of "experts" these Western imperialism lovers have to rely on

Thank god China will win

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    experts agree that im the best ever smartest boy and my opinions are correct

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    everyone i think this is a cat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Me, a cat? Nyo, never.


    ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The secret police have gotten reports that there's a cat here-abouts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    I thought said report had already been resolved [also genuinely interested in how cross instance report resolving works], no cat was found.


    ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Holy shit The Africa Center for Strategic Studies is literally owned by the Department of War, like how people fall to that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Westerners aren’t helpless innocents whose minds are injected with atrocity propaganda, science fiction-style; they’re generally smug bourgeois proletarians who intelligently seek out as much racist propaganda as they can get their hands on. This is because it fundamentally makes them feel better about who they are and how they live. The psychic and material costs are rationally worth the benefits. As for those anti-imperialists who don’t participate in this festival of xenophobia — and here I include myself — we have our own elitist consolation: we accept the tragedy of masses of gullible sheeple falling for cunning propaganda because having overcome it flatters our own intelligence. The more we condemn society’s stupidity, the smarter we feel in comparison.

    But am I not just worsening the problem, aggravating our hopelessness, by criticizing the critics in a way that suggests that no one escapes ideological self-flattery? I don’t think so. Paradoxically, it brings us all back to a more even and possibility-rich playing field.

    The prevailing populist narrative grants the People (of the West) moral innocence by attributing to them utter stupidity and naivety; I invert the equation and demand a Marxist narrative instead: Westerners are willingly complicit in crimes because they instinctively and correctly understand that they benefit as a class (as a global bourgeois proletariat) from the exploitation enabled by their military and their propaganda — organs of coercion and consent. We’re not as stupid as we’re made out to be. This means that we can be reasoned with, that there is a way out.

    from https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

  • source
  • parent