A candidate showed up very early to a job interview. How early? 3 months early. Before we even put up the ad. Him: "I'm here for the Junior Marketer role." Me: “Err...we aren't hiring." Him: "Not yet. I'm from the future and have travelled back to get a leg up on other applicants." I was floored. I couldn't argue with this dedication and hired him on the spot. After a couple months I suspected him to be a con artist and a compulsive liar and fired him on the spot. I vowed never to fall for the "I'm from the future" trick again. However, I realised that we actually do need a new Junior Marketer and put out a job ad for it the following Monday. That Monday was exactly 3 months after that man showed up "early". Wow. I might have fired a real time traveller. There is still so little we understand about the universe
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Interesting, we have the same expression in french and it is also commonly misunderstood and has also been traced back to latin ("Exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis") which was a law thing supposed to mean that the mention of an exception implies the existence of a rule. E.g "no parking on Sundays" implies you can park there the other days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    This is what I heard about the English variant, too. I wonder if "prove = test" is grounded in research, or just folk etymology like "the mall = a place to visit them all" or "news = North East West South" (both are wrong, but the news is quite old and may have had influence on new becoming news)

  • source
  • parent