522
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
522 points (93.4% liked)
Today I Learned
30718 readers
102 users here now
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Income comparisons aside, what the fuck is this "journalism"???
Did they deliberately only look at the cheapest cars to compare to the average American car in order to get their headline? Like I could buy 10 shitboxes from the junkyard for the average price of a new car, but that doesn't mean much.
Show me how many NEW cars you can buy in the US for less then 25k.
10 seconds on Google shows 3 under $25k, and 9 under $26k. I spent longer typing this comment than finding cheap cars XD
And the article lists 5 Chinese-made electric vehicles that are less than half that.
They would be closer in price if we had made trade agreements that required worker protections consistent with those in the US, instead of trying to bring every country on board with the US' idiotic copyright laws.
Sure, and the best quality stuff comes from TEMU.
Waves hands in vague direction of nearest Cybertruck
So the headline should read "buys 2 cars in China"? Still a valid criticism.
I mean, I guess it is if you want to pretend that twice as expensive is acceptable instead of addressing the problem.
Addressing the problem of bad journalism? Because that was the criticism.
omg it's so cute
As much as I appreciate the charger "nose", that's a bad place to have it if you park close to the wall
Chances are because that's such a small car, there would be ample space to park away from a wall and still remain within a standard car footprint.
One of my friends has an electric mini thats pretty sweet
but I bet it goes fast enough to use on a highway. The Wuling is closer to a Kei car.
Must be nice to live in a country where your vehicle working is a more important consideration than your vehicle making you feel like a big boy.
It's actually a great place to have the charger, I had a Nissan leaf for a number of years and it's great not having to worry about the cord reaching when you're at a public (free) charger.
I have an ioniq now and the charge port on the back quarter panel is the worst place for it, since almost all pull forward parking spots have a cord that doesn't reach.
I have to awkwardly back into angled forward spots if I want to use the charger, and most fast chargers on the interstate aren't designed for a back end charge port either, so you kinda have to find a very specific angle to get the car parked to charge.
The middle front works in almost every situation.
And it doubles as a coffin. Pays for itself.
That sounds like a limitation you could remove by broadening your horizons.
That sounds like some liberal bullshit to me
/j
That is the only reason why I don't own a Koenigsegg
I'm sorry, i can't pronounce that, I dont want it.
"I'm ignorant of foreign cultures"
Then learn how to pronounce it. What the fuck kind of stance is that?
Lol read more and learn? Or get mad and pout?
Yeah, this comparison is terrible they're purposefully putting an upper limit on price when comparing things. Not to mention that they aren't even looking at features and range of these cars.
Someone below mentions the "Wuling Hongguang", the top selling car in China apparently. While it's cheap, its max speed is 62mph and it has a range around 75 miles. Like of course that's cheap, and could work in some situations, but that's not comparable to any car sold in the US.
The more I read into things like this the more I realize that cars are just expensive. Sure China has a wider range of options, but when comparing apples to apples things look more similar than I'd expect.
100% agree, I too could get a car with no speed and range for cheap. Why compare that with something decent, and then brag about price?
These are sweet, and you can drive them on sidewalks! Try that with your Koenniggggsssegggg.
But then the average American car isn't even electric...
I think they were looking at the average price for a new car. All the new American cars are on the more expensive side
Someone's gotta pay for all that extra tech that the US Government is going to use to spy on you.
my first thought is how many dozen eggs could you get for the average cost of a dozen eggs over here. things don't always measure up one to one. I remember people talking about great electronics being tossed in japan or korea.
US average income being 6x China's was my first thought too, but then I got so fucking angry at how they fudge the numbers they're looking at for the headline.