▲ 72 ▼ YouTube confirms 3-strike policy for blocking ads (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 3 years ago by StandardIssueCalzone@lemmy.one to c/technology@beehaw.org 141 comments fedilink hide all child comments Whelp, here we go again
[–] vertelleus@beehaw.org 6 points 3 years ago (5 children) Anyone hoping there will be a mass exodus from YouTube to other--maybe fediverse YouTube alternatives, reminiscent of the Reddit exodus? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 years ago Video hosting is way too expensive and complex to be decentralised. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Invader753@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Yes I hope, but I don't see it happening. Creators will go where the masses are and where the money is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Chobbes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago YouTube is a very different scale of platform... There's probably ways that it could be done, and I know things like PeerTube do exist, but... Storing video is expensive, serving video is expensive, transcoding video is expensive... While I'd love to see it, I'd also worry a little bit about the retention of videos over time. YouTube's video archive is kind of insanely valuable, and it'd be a shame to have it disappear. Not that I necessarily think it's safe in Google's hands, mind you, I just worry that people self-hosting video would drop out pretty quickly. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 point 3 years ago fediverse YouTube alternatives Yea, so who's hosting the videos and providing the bandwidth? permalink fedilink source parent [–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago Well, PeerTube exists, but IDK how good it actually is since basically no one uses it. I also think professional content creators aren't going to like the Fediverse very much since there is significantly less money in it, but for hobbyists it could work. Of all the big social media platforms, video hosting/streaming is the hardest case to replace. It'll be interesting though. I hear PeerTube works like torrents. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 years ago Video hosting is way too expensive and complex to be decentralised. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Invader753@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago Yes I hope, but I don't see it happening. Creators will go where the masses are and where the money is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chobbes@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago YouTube is a very different scale of platform... There's probably ways that it could be done, and I know things like PeerTube do exist, but... Storing video is expensive, serving video is expensive, transcoding video is expensive... While I'd love to see it, I'd also worry a little bit about the retention of videos over time. YouTube's video archive is kind of insanely valuable, and it'd be a shame to have it disappear. Not that I necessarily think it's safe in Google's hands, mind you, I just worry that people self-hosting video would drop out pretty quickly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 point 3 years ago fediverse YouTube alternatives Yea, so who's hosting the videos and providing the bandwidth? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 1 point 3 years ago Well, PeerTube exists, but IDK how good it actually is since basically no one uses it. I also think professional content creators aren't going to like the Fediverse very much since there is significantly less money in it, but for hobbyists it could work. Of all the big social media platforms, video hosting/streaming is the hardest case to replace. It'll be interesting though. I hear PeerTube works like torrents. permalink fedilink source parent