submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [M] to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
 

Due to a (now former) admin of the instance anarchist.nexus calling for a member of our team, as well as anyone else they call a zionist, to be murdered, the instance has been defederated.

We're currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation and whether it will affect lemmy.dbzer0.com, which is mostly run by the same admin team, notably excluding the person who used to be on the anarchist.nexus admin team.

We will share further updates once we have them.


Update 2026-04-22 23:25 UTC: anarchist.nexus federation has been reactivated.

We are still discussing this matter, but there is currently no point in keeping anarchist.nexus defederated while lemmy.dbzer0.com is federated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Yeah people vote and if it doesn't go in the way the establishment wants then superdelegates can correct for the general publics error. See e.g. what happened to the zionist bernie sanders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Proof? Strong evidence even? Vaguely pointing to sanders (for whom I voted) does not mean anything -- which is why Bernie Sanders himself continues to caucus with Democrats and does not adopt your approach, including but not limited to the likes of Mamdani, AOC, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    There is a very detailed write up floating around somewhere I'll link it if I find it, in the meantime https://edition.cnn.com/2016/06/06/politics/superdelegates-hillary-clinton-nomination/index.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I believe she won a majority of pledged delegates independent of superdelegates -- however, this I do agree with how fucked up that was as someone who campaigned for Sanders that year.

    But further; a) Why has Sanders continued with Democrats then (even running again in 2020), and b) it's worth noting the rules on superdelegates changed after 2016. So, progress

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    The primaries were rigged, I can't find the write-up sry

    https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/

    I mean he continued with the dems for the obvious reason I should think. He is part of the establishment, certainly a zionist, and would prefer the cushy place he carved out for himself within the dem machinery as the lightning rod for leftist deviations to the grueling work of grassroots organizing. Imagine if bernie actually went rogue, what he would have to give up. This was the path he chose way back in the 90s and he isn't gonna give up soon.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OLNQEHbusSA

    If you want a deepdive into bernie and the 2016 campaign the ask on hexbear, a lot of people that organized for bernie and got disillusioned and radicalised in particular by the 2016 rigging are on there. They can likely give you a week-by-week run down of the campaign lol. Or how the dem system is rigged for the establishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] -1 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Bernie, an Establishment Zionist!?

    hahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaha

    Got my new tag for you, thanks lol

    I'll just end it here to cover my bases: Slava Ukraini, fuck Xi, fuck Putin, fuck the Ayatollah and IRGC, fuck the Saudis, and yes of course fuck Bibi and Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 4 months ago*

    That's what I get for engaging in good faith I guess ๐Ÿ‘ should have stuck with my first assessment of bluemaga

    This is the "don't let perfect be the enemy good" crowd when it comes to resisting genocide. Youre ok with the dems supporting genocide, murder of hundreds of thousands, and tell people to support them, but when the only armed resistance of a desperate people lashes out in their desperation you condemn them immediately and would likely prefer them disarmed despite the consequences for this.

  • source
  • parent