science

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago (5 children)

how could he have read the abstract? The link is a science article, not the study.

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

[deleted]

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago (3 children)

Im betting when he said paper he meant the link in the post. At least I thought so. I get what you are saying but in an internet forum I usually assume words are used in the most generic sense.

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[+] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

fair enough.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Eldermantle@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago

FWIW I think it was a fair question.

parent

[–] Eldermantle@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago

Hmm… I thought I’d read the paper, but it turned out I got confused by an abstract with multiple sections. I thought it was very short. My mistake

So I can’t say whether the authors addressed whether the low carbohydrate group was selecting for people already known to be at risk.