you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 5 months ago (7 children)

since interface has been designed to be as unfriendly as possible

No, it hasn't.

It (well, vi, which vim is a clone of) has been designed to be a possible interface on a keyboard that doesn't have arrow keys or other modifier keys than shift. There aren't that many ways to program a visual text editor when those are your constraints.

That it's more productive once you know it is a side-effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    You don't have to move your hands while touch typing. This is the single biggest reason why vim is still used today, regardless of whether you have arrow keys or not. In fact vim does support arrow keys and using the mouse as well! It's just much easier to edit files without needing to move your hands and/or use a touchpad/mouse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Even then, not having to move your hands means not spending time... Moving your hands.

    This is useful for people who want to spend time learning to be enforcement at what they do. In the same way that holding a Nintendo controller "weird" is useful for Tetris speed runners.

    If you are as efficient as you need to be using a shower interface, then great. Other people need (or more likely want) to be more efficient than that.

    Maybe I'm a luddite, but I still don't understand why people want to spend their time arguing with Claude code and fixing it's bugs. Rather than just learning to write productive coffee themselves. But, people do. That's their choice, and I let them to it.

    If prefer to spend my time learning him and code, than Claude and idiosyncrasies, and then whatever to comes next, and next again.

  • source
  • parent