you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    From an environmental standard, sure, but the true reason for it is genuinely disturbing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    What is disturbing about it? Cars are more expensive now, so we found something else? That's the only way it would ever happen. People hate change. It is either "cars too expensive, so people change" or "traffic too terrible, so people change" or "cars too full of annoying electronics, so people change."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Cars should not be so expensive that people have to start using scooters and skate boards to get around. That's fine for students, but a moral governmental system should be able to offer essential goods at prices that working people can afford. We should be able to manufacture vehicles at an affordable price, and people should make enough income to pay it.

    It would mean less profit for the parasites at the top, but I don't care about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I'm pretty anti-car myself. I've never had a license. I've never had a job. My feet have taken me from town to town. Mix of using public transport as well. I've never let not having a vehicle let me not show up to work.

    I make the same amount of money as my coworkers yet I save so much not having car insurance, car troubles, a tank to fill.

    There's several reasons why I don't drive but the older I get the less I regret my choice in life.

  • source
  • parent