497
Appearances can be something (thelemmy.club)
submitted 6 months ago* by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 6 months ago (3 children)

One big reason people outright reject AI generated code is that it shifts the work from author to the reviewer. AI makes it easier to make low effort commits that look good on surface, but are very flawed. So far LLMs don't match the wisdom of an experienced software dev.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This is what happened with FFMpeg when Google was trying the same thing to promote their models. If the code is good, and doesn't put unnecessary burden on the reviewer, then that's great. But when the patches are sloppy or the reviews are overwhelming, it doesn't help the project, it hinders it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    It's almost like there should be a human in the loop to guide and review what the ai is doing.

    The thing works a lot better when I give it smaller chunks of work that I know are possible. Works best when I know how to implement it myself and it just saves me from looking up all the syntax.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    totally agee also same problem with published scientific papers .

    I just assume that since this code submission was done by Anthropic itself - probably to demonstrate how good their AI has became ( I don't know what is the actual background to this story) - FFmpeg team gave it more consideration as opposed to a random amature.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent