crime is a spook
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 5 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    No shit, but looking at past results is how we make informed decisions about literally everything. What the fuck is your point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (8 children)

    they don't know what a future looks like without the state or capital.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    We can cross that bridge when we get there. Until then, using actual data is more useful than wishful thinking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    to be clear, you don't know the future

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    No shit. Again, what's your fucking point? Stop being vague and obtuse and just say what you're getting at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    any claim about the future is dubious, and theirs to a great degree

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Using the past to make an informed decision on how to proceed is not making dubious claims about the future. The only one making dubious claims about the future is you. Please explain to me how disolving the state would somehow make vigilante justice more effective, considering that vigilante justice is already outside the purview of the state?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I never said vigilante justice would be more effective. you're arguing with a strawman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments