From here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 49 points 6 months ago (18 children)

Something about this hits the uncanny valley for me.

Touched-up with AI?

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I think it might be the lighting and backdrop. They're brightly lit from one side, with a very dark background, making them really pop out. It reminds me of the lighting that was popular in 1990's formal portrait photos, which I always thought looked odd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago

    Professional photography has been around for a long time. There's lots of it.

    AI basically just copies existing things.

    Ai copies professional photography.

    Photo looks professional.

    Therefore, photo looks ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Professional digital editors who have existed for decades take days to to touch up photos for press releases.

    Fucking morons on the Internet in 2026: is this AI??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    I would say inexperienced, not morons. I didn't assume AI, but it did feel edited. To younger people who have more experience with ai edits vs professional editing, they're just going off what they know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    If you assume everything is AI because it's doesn't quite look perfect, even if it's just a picture being taken because professional photography exists... You're a fucking moron and you should be called out for it.

    Has nothing to do with inexperience. If you assume everything is AI you're an idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No one’s looking at the same camera?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments