you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

Correct but irrelevant to what I’ve said, which is that the performance impact of Denuvo is usually minimal. There’s a couple of very bad cases that got a lot of publicity but there’s boatloads of Denuvo games running fine.

It’s cool Denuvo was cracked. It’ll be fixed eventually and the never ending game of cat and mouse continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It's not about performance for me. I'm not paying for a single player offline game that requires internet. I was around for the Spore DRM. That started with 3 activations and having to call EA for more. Even the current 5 activations per day is too restrictive, as I've heard changing proton version counts as an activation. If I don't own it (yes technically you don't steam games, but I think I could easily bypass steam protection and still play my games if it came down to it) I'm not buying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    article goes into why Denuvo is bad but not much more (which is debatable...

    I mentioned why denuvo is bad. I wasn't replying specifically to your argument about performance, because that's only a slice of the reason why denuvo is bad.

  • source
  • parent