Data from Vanguard shows Americans are pulling money out of their retirement accounts early at record rates to help make ends meet.

Last year, 6% of Vanguard's clients took a hardship withdrawal, which allows them to access funds in tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as a 401(k), before they reach retirement age. That was up from 4.8% in 2024, the asset management giant said.

Taking a hardship withdrawal is not ideal for a few reasons, one of them being that investors are subject to a withdrawal penalty of 10% for taking money out of their account before 59½. On top of that, they are then taxed on any gains. However, perhaps most importantly, they rob themselves of future growth potential on that money, especially if they are still far from retirement age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Because that was the deal to be allowed to invest that money without paying taxes

The goal, at a societal level, is the incentivize keeping it in a retirement fund

You can always pay yaxes and invest the money in a brokerage account if you don't want to risk penalties

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    That’s fine but why does the incentive become a hurdle when life gets in the way? If I lost my job, and my house, and needed money, getting penalized for having life happens doesn’t look like an incentive anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Because if you didn't do that, everyone would put 100% of their money into their 401k (at least up to the contribution limit) and then withdraw it right back out to avoid paying taxes on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    You pay taxes when you withdraw. The 10% is additional penalty for early withdrawal.

    You are generally better off doing a loan if your plan allows since you pay yourself back with interest. Of course that requires you to be employed and planning on staying at that job until it's repaid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I understand that, but the other user can't seem to imagine why they won't let you withdraw this tax-free income without any sort of penalty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You pay income taxes when you withdraw (meaning withdrawals are treated as income). However, 401ks also have the benefit of not being taxed while they grow. So you can contribute money pre-tax and don't pay taxes while the money grows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Because the cost of the agreement is the promise not to withdrawal. Otherwise you're asking for something for nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    So I should have foresight to years later if I may have a life altering instance happening in my future?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Putting fees on early withdrawals actually disincentivizes people from using 401ks or Roth IRAs. I’ve been unemployed for 3 of the last 5 years and I know that I will not be investing in retirement accounts until I have several years of steady employment under my belt, simply because I know I may need that money. The job market simply isn’t stable enough for me to even think about parking my money somewhere I can’t access it. I know I’m not alone.

    I get what you’re saying but they should at least allow you to withdraw if you become unemployed.

  • source
  • parent