you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I beg to differ. For a start the 3.5 billion figure is for the reactor alone. The whole project was calculated to cost 8 billion and of course it got more expensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Well, let's start with the obvious: Why is the second Chinese bar not burgundry?

    Next: Why are specific projects listed against an average for China? That's the cheapest trick in the book for skewing statistics. Compare specific instances against averages.

    Finally: Sources? Trust us, bro!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment