you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 21 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I think that was too damn good for ai slop. But i understand your concern and I am also interested in the source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    AI vids can be pretty damn hard to spot these days. My mom sent me a vid on silver investing and it even took me a minute to be sure. She wouldn't have spotted it if I didn't raise the question, we were spooked

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Gotta be. Camera cuts are 8 seconds or less. Which isn't a universal limit anymore but indicates a cheaper model or plan.

    Also things move wierd. Like the stabbing motion with the gun. Or the squid sitting in strange positions instead of "attaching" to the head like you assume it would. In a wierd way I feel like I can almost recognize what films this may have been trained on.

    Also over the last month there has been a deluge of ai videos being made from this perspective on this topic. Context is usually biggest evidence, barring everything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    The shots are way too consistent to be AI. If it was AI, we'd expect background details to change between each one. This feels like a high quality robot chicken production

    Edit: See my newer top level comment with source. It is indeed AI

  • source
  • parent