▲ 1239 ▼ It's sad that people completely misunderstand what Star Trek is about. (thelemmy.club) submitted 5 months ago by daggermoon@piefed.world to c/startrek@startrek.website 245 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Which part of my explanation did you not understand or disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your explanation didn't explain what "forced inclusion" means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. Maybe you could give an example of each from Star Trek? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I think it did. If you disagree please tell me how. I provided two examples. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your explanation didn't explain what "forced inclusion" means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. Maybe you could give an example of each from Star Trek? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I think it did. If you disagree please tell me how. I provided two examples. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I think it did. If you disagree please tell me how. I provided two examples. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your two examples didn’t explain what “forced inclusion” means and what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) "Nuh uh" isn't an argument. If you won't read the comment then I won't be able to give you a meaningful reply. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago (1 child) Your examples provided made no mention of "forced inclusion" or what makes it different from regular inclusion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (1 child) I clearly explained the distinction despite not using the term "forced inclusion," which I didn't raise. You did. I can't reply qualitatively unless you explain which part confuses you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child) ...this you? What does “forced inclusion” mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child) Yes, in response to this comment. Agreed. People should dislike modern Star Trek for it’s bad writing, not because it’s progressive. I didn't raise the topic. I replied to it. I presume you can see that comment? Are you using an application which truncates the discussion? If you disagree with something, feel free to tell me what :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) You introduced the term “forced inclusion”. What does that term mean? What makes it different from regular inclusion? permalink fedilink source parent
