Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country's Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to "obliterate" Iran's power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about "winding down" the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran's ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be 'completely destroyed', if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be 'lawful' targets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm in a very very privileged position to be able to say this, but I am more than happy to pay a little bit extra at the pump and on my gas bill, just for that colossal fuckwomble to be shown up on the world stage for being a weapons grade tosser.

Is it childish? Yes. Does it make me feel slightly better about the world? Also yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    How long do you think that position will last?

    If energy infrastructure is destroyed, then "paying a little bit extra at the pump" is just the beginning. You will need to reduce your overall consumption by 15-20%.

    Remember the worst month of Covid? That's the last time consumption was reduced so heavily. Now imagine that Covid lifestyle for 5 years as energy infrastructure is rebuilt.

    The joy of Trump's downfall will not be enough to mask the real economic pain, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I feel like this would be a net win for the world. Everyone in the old empire is shooting themselves in the dick right now. If Iran stops the flow of oil, countries are going to be forced to very, very, very quickly invest heavily in renewables more than they already are.

    This idiot may have single handedly put a dent in global warming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Also an Oil Shock will almost certainly cause the AI bubble to burst, another win which also reduces global warming.

    Personally I would also love to see the ended of the Reserve Currency status for the USD, which is a possible consequence of the reduction in use of Oil (though it's a less likely outcome in the short and even mid term).

    PS: By the way, great username.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    I also recognize my privileged position when I say this: I'm pretty sure I can tolerate it longer than the American Oligarchs will tolerate the loss of profit and start using those politicians they've purchased to put an end to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    It will accelerate energy transition.

    Even Fertilizers can be produced from renewable power (the hydrogen needed to make Amonia can be produced by electrolosys) and need not be made from gas.

    A short sharp pain might be in the best mid and long term interest for most of us, the environment and even parts of the Middle East itself (American interference there makes no sense if their Oil is just another unimportant mineral product) and it might even lead to the end of the USD Reserve Currency status.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Shit. Maybe the Alberta oil sands will finally be profitable! Haha, nah just kidding. They wont.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    They've been profitable for some time.

    A lot of people say they're profitable at $60/barrel, but it's more like between $50 and $80, depending on a bunch different factors, such as location and extraction method.

    But that's only considering profitability in the terms of the current political system.

    If a new system came along that factored in harms to the environment, global warming, etc., they could go back to being unprofitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -17 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    So the tens of millions that are going to suffer famine across the global south, and the tens of thousands that will die in the third world hospitals without power, are price you're willing to pay?

    Good to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    No you illiterate fuck, I said I'd pay a little more at the pump to see one of the most narcissistic and dangerous world leaders get knocked down a peg or two on the world stage.

    It's soul destroying seeing the human cost of such a conflict, but your virtue signalling is both misplaced and ineffective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    You're literally cheering for what you view as set of political upsides to war, and when I point out the rest of it, you get defensive.

    I wonder why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I think this wondering you're doing is the root cause of your problem.

    You've come up with an idea that I think there's any political upsides to war based on some assumption that I haven't quite figured out yet.

    You've come up with an entire "rest of it" which doesn't really follow anything presented in the original post.

    Your "gotcha" moment doesn't exist and is aimed at someone deeply saddened and angered by this pointless war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments