you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 6 months ago (14 children)

"we interviewed only haters and they all of them complained about the thing they hate"

What a garbage article.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    yeah it's not like the like/dislike ratio on nvidia's video is overwhelming negative... it's the haters that are wrong!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    This is such a braindead take that completely misses my original point. I know reading levels have dropped globally but come on now, you can do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    you don't have a point, there is nothing to discuss, it's just funny to me that you came to the conclusion that everyone hating on DLSS 5 is just a hater for no reason at all

    only shareholders and gooners love this ai slop filter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    you don’t have a point, there is nothing to discuss,

    Nice assumption, too bad its wrong.

    Remind me again exactly who was interviewed in this article and what roles they have in?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    Yeah. Did you read it? I did. Tell me what you understood from the article you read on the precisely WHO was interviewed, because I have doubts on your reading comprehension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (5 children)

    there is nothing to discuss about 'haters' because they talked to real game devs not random haters on social media

    read the article, you, read the article, please, go and look what games the devs have made

    GO READ THE ARTICLE

    the only person jumping to conclusions is YOU congrats!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    ok so I asked you to list precisely what game devs they interviewed and you gave me nothing.

    Thanks for confirming you cannot parse the article of specific info.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    You replied to someone else bud, and I'm not chatgpt for you I won't parse shit

    I literally played a game by doinksoft: GatoRoboto.

    Again, you don't even have a point, unless you can explain why is it relevant who are the game devs? Are they too woke for you? Not enough? Do you think game designers are not game devs? Please explain your point for all of us to read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    If you bother reading the article, you'll note that the majority of developers interviewed are not people who would need this technology to begin with. Like all technologies, it is a choice to integrate it.

    This article selected specifically for voices that were already against it/had no need for it.

    Whether the tech is good or bad is irrelevant, because the article is horribly biased in one direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Well let's hope the people who NEED it are vocal about it because I don't see them anywhere.

    Idk man I guess former animator for RDR2 doesn't need it. I'm gonna assume you think indie devs or 2D games don't need it.

    I guess only gooners need it, they are gonna integrate it like nude mods and other bs, they already love to pass AI filters on women

    Thanks for making me waste worktime reading the article for the 3rd time today because I was in doubt with myself but every time it stayed the same

    Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

    If you can't recognize bias in an obviously biased article, then your media literacy skills need work so that you can recognize different types of bias.

    Hell even the current popular LLM's, which are glorified statistics chat bots, can see this pattern and identify heavily statistical traits of bias in this article.

  • source
  • parent