▲ 323 ▼ France bids to suspend Shein over childlike sex dolls (www.abc.net.au) submitted 7 months ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago (6 children) is absolutely disgusting Why not ban scat fetish then as well? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago (5 children) Scat fetish typically involves grown adults. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 13 points 7 months ago* (4 children) Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults. You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago (3 children) Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me. Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago (5 children) Scat fetish typically involves grown adults. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 13 points 7 months ago* (4 children) Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults. You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago (3 children) Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me. Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 13 points 7 months ago* (4 children) Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults. You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago (3 children) Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me. Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago (3 children) Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me. Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children) Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me. Adult men having sex with another men? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view. Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it's good enough to ban sex dolls? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 9 points 7 months ago You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time's suddenly up. "Disgusting, you're probably a pedophile, I don't care that there's no victim, it's obvious so I don't need to explain it" has been your entire contribution so far. If you don't care about trying to change anyone's mind, then I don't know what you're even doing here besides just making noise. permalink fedilink source parent