165
submitted 2 days ago by Nemoder@lemmy.ml to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nemoder@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 days ago

Yeah unfortunate. At least the first comments there corrected them.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

There was some asshole on the threadiverse saying that copy-left licenses weren't open source, since you weren't allowed to profit off the free code. 

I say this at the risk of signal posting this regressive view to say that anybody should be allowed to view and learn from software, and benefitting from such work while closing off future access is shitty. Find some other way to make money that doesn't involve freeloading off of someone's contribution to community.

[-] Nemoder@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

You are allowed to charge for most libre-licensed software, but of course in practice if it's popular enough somebody else will just build it and undercut you.

I do wish there were more institutions funding FOSS work though it can be hard to measure the benefits and progress for individual projects.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Some countries fund it -- QGIS for example is used and developed by governments as an alternative to ESRI products. Maybe there are other examples?

https://members.qgis.org/en/members/list/

[-] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was using QGIS in work to simplify geometries of US postal code geo jsons and it was an impressive bit of kit. I enjoyed how 2002 it looked, but underneath it was an absolute machine.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
165 points (94.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

22085 readers
15 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS