589
Lutris is AI slop now (thelemmy.club)
submitted 6 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
203 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 62 points 6 months ago* (14 children)

Turns out GloriousEggroll who is best known for Nobara and GE-Proton is defending this shit as well.

Source

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 36 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    It's really hard to argue against that final paragraph though for real. These are free time projects that people spend time on for the benefit of others. I dunno. Food for thought?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Actually you can refute that argument since the main dev defends Anthropic as a good guy compared to other AI companies. As we know Claude being used by Pentagon in the war with Iran. But shouldn't use that, it will drag into unnecessary argument war, since they have set in mind to use AI generated-code.

    And that leaves us with no choice but to use alternatives, as they have removed AI co-authorship.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    It's not a good situation right now, definitely. I do not condones using AI at all, but I definitely understand why people tend to resort to it if they have limited time and want to spend it on other things but still want to give their time and effort for free to the community.

    Hiding it from the community though? Shitty behavior.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yes the mere existence of slop machines is totally forcing those developers to shit all over their painstakingly crafted creations and deliberately hiding it. Really hard to argue with that.

    If its such a bother to create something without supporting these fascist enabling and thieving cunts that are all AI companies, maybe they should consider not doing anything at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 28 points 6 months ago

    This kind of thinking is what makes billionaires who back AI companies to keep increasing their investments in AI Capex, while leaving others with nothing but increasingly expensive parts and damaged environments.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Come on, is there anything that's safe?!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago

    Nobody has managed to stuff an LLMbecile into my fountain (or dip) pens yet. Not even into my ballpoint pens. Nor pencils, even the fancy schmancy "eternal" pencils I have.

    Nobody has manged to jam an LLMbecile into any of my notebooks, neither the cheap-and-nasty ring-bound ones nor the home-made, home-bound ones I played with making for a while.

    Nobody has found a way to cram an LLMbecile into my books, my playing cards, even my (tabletop) RPGs and board games.

    Seems like loads of things are safe. Just not computers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    "We live in a capitalist hellscape so why bother to struggle against it" isn't a completely unreasonable take. Too bad, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •