you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I think they would have done well if they did not stray so far after SR2. It’s fun fooling around and being wacky in a game that has realism to it but when the game is built solely around being wacky it’s just boring.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I don't agree at all. SR3 and 4 were peak for me. I don't want a game that feels like it lives in the shadow of GTA. SR4 really had it's own personality and it was a ton of fun for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    they would have done well if they did not stray so far after SR2

    And yet their successful games were SR3 and SR4, when the games could stand on their own instead of needing to tag along with GTA for publicity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment