▲ 488 ▼ Administrative task management (thelemmy.club) submitted 6 months ago by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) March 1999, based on the wall calendar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) 98? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) Looks more like 1958 to me, the whole thing is a blur. Doesn't seem like a compression thing, more like AI generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (2 children) Given that she's holding what is the second most booty-ass rendition of what's apparently supposed to be a Beretta Model 92 I've seen in my life, AI generation seems to be a fair assessment. Edit: And the shadow on it makes no sense. Never mind the watermark in the corner. Edit edit: And March 1998 began on a Sunday. The more you look the worse it all gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago i love this deep dive lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) I think it says 1998. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 6 months ago I read 1958, but it could just be blurry permalink fedilink source parent [–] hesh@quokk.au 1 point 6 months ago I initially thought 1998, but March 1 wasn't on Monday that year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children) 98? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) Looks more like 1958 to me, the whole thing is a blur. Doesn't seem like a compression thing, more like AI generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (2 children) Given that she's holding what is the second most booty-ass rendition of what's apparently supposed to be a Beretta Model 92 I've seen in my life, AI generation seems to be a fair assessment. Edit: And the shadow on it makes no sense. Never mind the watermark in the corner. Edit edit: And March 1998 began on a Sunday. The more you look the worse it all gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago i love this deep dive lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 child) Looks more like 1958 to me, the whole thing is a blur. Doesn't seem like a compression thing, more like AI generation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (2 children) Given that she's holding what is the second most booty-ass rendition of what's apparently supposed to be a Beretta Model 92 I've seen in my life, AI generation seems to be a fair assessment. Edit: And the shadow on it makes no sense. Never mind the watermark in the corner. Edit edit: And March 1998 began on a Sunday. The more you look the worse it all gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago i love this deep dive lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago* (2 children) Given that she's holding what is the second most booty-ass rendition of what's apparently supposed to be a Beretta Model 92 I've seen in my life, AI generation seems to be a fair assessment. Edit: And the shadow on it makes no sense. Never mind the watermark in the corner. Edit edit: And March 1998 began on a Sunday. The more you look the worse it all gets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago i love this deep dive lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago i love this deep dive lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago It also has the AI watermark in the bottom right corner. This one doesn't take a rocket surgeon to pinpoint. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 point 6 months ago (2 children) I think it says 1998. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 6 months ago I read 1958, but it could just be blurry permalink fedilink source parent [–] hesh@quokk.au 1 point 6 months ago I initially thought 1998, but March 1 wasn't on Monday that year. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 point 6 months ago I read 1958, but it could just be blurry permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hesh@quokk.au 1 point 6 months ago I initially thought 1998, but March 1 wasn't on Monday that year. permalink fedilink source parent