169
submitted 1 month ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wasnt banned. They didnt meet the advertisment requirments. Its false outrage to generate clicks. Its quite disappointing of them thought they knew better.

[-] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

As someone who isn't familiar with the UK advertising laws, is this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_Standards_Authority_(United_Kingdom) what you mean?

[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think one of the big ones is the actor saying 'pedophiles' in the first 5 seconds. Possibly wasnt within the guidelines. Watch the video its extremely clear why it wasnt fit for broadcast and was never intended to be.

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Let's just settle in the obvious that there was no way this video was over going to pass and they were going to find any means necessary to sack it.

[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

Isnt that what i said?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
169 points (95.2% liked)

Privacy

4393 readers
124 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS