169
submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It wasnt banned. They didnt meet the advertisment requirments. Its false outrage to generate clicks. Its quite disappointing of them thought they knew better.

[-] Corbin@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

It isn't the first time that the advertising requirements were used to chill speech. It doesn't matter whether there was a ban; what matters is whether speech was effectively prevented. "There is no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life."

[-] Funky_Beak@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wouldnt surprise me that it was. Its what its likely designed to do. Doesnt mean mullvad werent aware of it and took advantage in a dishonest way

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
169 points (95.2% liked)

Privacy

4393 readers
34 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS