▲ 962 ▼ Stephen Colbert’s unaired James Talarico interview hits 6.4 million YouTube views and results in $2.5 million raised for Talarico’s campaign in 24 hours (variety.com) submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 55 points 6 months ago (2 children) permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) Whose beach shack is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's Barbara Streisand's. The term was coined in 2005 by Mike Masnick of Techdirt after Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress the publication of a photograph by Kenneth Adelman showing her clifftop residence in Malibu, taken to document coastal erosion in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago Things humans have done, like damming rivers, have accelerated and altered coastal erosion patterns to a huge degree. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) It's a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that's why we document and do some research about it?! I'm not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia's article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago "Lifestyles of the Rich and Infamous" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) Whose beach shack is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's Barbara Streisand's. The term was coined in 2005 by Mike Masnick of Techdirt after Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress the publication of a photograph by Kenneth Adelman showing her clifftop residence in Malibu, taken to document coastal erosion in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago Things humans have done, like damming rivers, have accelerated and altered coastal erosion patterns to a huge degree. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) It's a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that's why we document and do some research about it?! I'm not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia's article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's Barbara Streisand's. The term was coined in 2005 by Mike Masnick of Techdirt after Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress the publication of a photograph by Kenneth Adelman showing her clifftop residence in Malibu, taken to document coastal erosion in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago Things humans have done, like damming rivers, have accelerated and altered coastal erosion patterns to a huge degree. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) It's a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that's why we document and do some research about it?! I'm not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia's article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (2 children) Shy of those houses being there, what’s so bad about the sea reshaping the shoreline? Hasn’t that been going on for quite some time already, like, a few hundred million years or so? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago Things humans have done, like damming rivers, have accelerated and altered coastal erosion patterns to a huge degree. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) It's a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that's why we document and do some research about it?! I'm not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia's article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago Things humans have done, like damming rivers, have accelerated and altered coastal erosion patterns to a huge degree. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 child) It's a natural phenomenon but AFAIK it can be accentuated or accelerated by the rise of the sea level, or the passage of boats and vessels. It can be entirely normal, but it can also be provoked or worsened by other factors. And that's why we document and do some research about it?! I'm not a climate scientist but luckily the Wikipedia's article on the Streisand effect has a link to coastal erosion if you want to know more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago That makes sense. We want to understand our impact on the environment. I guess I was just wondering why it seemed like an inherent problem, but I suppose it’s more a question of whether we’re disturbing the natural process in ways that ultimately cause undue detriment to the ecosystem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago "Lifestyles of the Rich and Infamous" permalink fedilink source parent
