663
LOL (thelemmy.club)
submitted 19 hours ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 72 points 14 hours ago

When I was in school we were told wikipedia was not a reliable source even though it’s heavily controlled and moderated.

Now we have people asking tardbots about any- and everything and regurgitate the answer as if it were gospel.

Where the hell did we go wrong?

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 25 points 10 hours ago

By spending more on the military and the police than we do on education, science, and journalism.

Wikipedia still isn't a reliable source. It is a compendium of reliable sources that one can use to get an overview of a subject. This is also what these chatbots should be, but they rarely cite their sources and most people don't bother to verify anyway.

[-] Saterz@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

They do give their sources

[-] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago

By allowing right wing politicians to do what they do practically unchallenged for decades.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
663 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

5920 readers
2081 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS