▲ 852 ▼ Beyond fucked up (CW: sexualizing children) (thelemmy.club) submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 246 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 months ago (2 children) One was a boomer and one was Matt Dillon who was their age, but yeah it was an insane movie. AND IT WAS BILLED AS FAMILY ENTERTIANMENT TOO!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago the family that fucks together has therapy forever! permalink fedilink source parent [–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago* The image above shows that it was rated R, so not a family movie. IDK, that kinda makes it worse in a way? If it were PG then there wouldn’t be any nudity. And a PG movie could be intended for actual teenagers. A rated R movie is primarily for an 18+ audience, so these girls were definitely being marketed to the adult male gaze. ETA: I saw this decades ago when I was way too young and don’t recall if there was actually nudity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago the family that fucks together has therapy forever! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 1 point 6 months ago* The image above shows that it was rated R, so not a family movie. IDK, that kinda makes it worse in a way? If it were PG then there wouldn’t be any nudity. And a PG movie could be intended for actual teenagers. A rated R movie is primarily for an 18+ audience, so these girls were definitely being marketed to the adult male gaze. ETA: I saw this decades ago when I was way too young and don’t recall if there was actually nudity. permalink fedilink source parent
