▲ 356 ▼ How Vibe Coding Is Killing Open Source (hackaday.com) submitted 8 months ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Feyd@programming.dev 45 points 8 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Paragone@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) TheRegister had an article, a year or 2 ago, about using AI in the opposite way: instead of creating the code, someone was using it to discover security-problems in it, & they said it was really useful for that, & most of its identified things, including some codebase which was sending private information off to some internet-server, which really are problems. I wonder if using LLM's as editors, instead of writers, would be better-use for the things? _ /\ _ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago* A second pair of eyes has always been an acceptable way to use this imo, but it shouldnt be primary or only permalink fedilink source parent [–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago They are pretty good at summarisation. If I want to catch up with a long review thread on a patch series I've just started looking at I occasionally ask Gemini to outline the development so far and the remaining issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children) TheRegister had an article, a year or 2 ago, about using AI in the opposite way: instead of creating the code, someone was using it to discover security-problems in it, & they said it was really useful for that, & most of its identified things, including some codebase which was sending private information off to some internet-server, which really are problems. I wonder if using LLM's as editors, instead of writers, would be better-use for the things? _ /\ _ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago* A second pair of eyes has always been an acceptable way to use this imo, but it shouldnt be primary or only permalink fedilink source parent [–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago They are pretty good at summarisation. If I want to catch up with a long review thread on a patch series I've just started looking at I occasionally ask Gemini to outline the development so far and the remaining issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago* A second pair of eyes has always been an acceptable way to use this imo, but it shouldnt be primary or only permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago They are pretty good at summarisation. If I want to catch up with a long review thread on a patch series I've just started looking at I occasionally ask Gemini to outline the development so far and the remaining issues. permalink fedilink source parent