1202
17 years* (thelemmy.club)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
238 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://mastodon.online/@FranckLeroy/109627512801712672

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Interesting! So at best you could narrow down the purchaser to one of many possible sources.

My first thought is that a large enough organization trying to demask you could do so by looking at repeat subscription purchases over time coming from the same wallet. You know, like a monthly fee for a VPN. The first month you're one of a thousand people. The second month. Maybe you're one of 500. Eventually they get you.

But I know nothing about XMR, they probably solved for this. I just can't be bothered to read :-D

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    I believe the way they deal with this is by having the recipient create a one-time address for every sender, so it is not possible to recognize patterns between senders and recipients. Another thing is that every wallet has two associated keys. There is a "spend key", which is a write-only key that can spend money from the wallet, and a "view key", which can be used to view the contents of the wallet. You can publish the view key if you want that to be public information, but you don't have to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent