cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59469059

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Last time this came up Patreon simply allowed the creators to charge the commission directly on top of the price for non apple users, or eat the 30% loss. So everyone not using iOS would pay, say, $5/month, iOS users would pay $5+30%. Hope they retain that option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    That's actually a good solution

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago*

    Is it? Previously this was considered tips

    Now it’s 30% for what? Running a payment gateway and hiding an unsubscribe button deep in the App Store UI.

    Competitively payment gateways charge 1-3%, but when you lock down a platform you can charge 10x that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Not that good, the backlash was immense and if I remember right, people were dropping patreon subs over it.

    EDIT: I might also not be remembering right. The thing I'm thinking of was an additional fee regardless of what platform you used to access Patreon.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    It’s logical but it probably scares away some customers. That’s why the “just eat it” option exists. iOS gives you access to an enormous market and payments are slick and easy. Creators may want $5 but if they can get 30% less from 500% more people, it’s still a good business for them. There’s no strict reason why they must obsess over taking 100% of the sticker price. There are a million examples of businesses who are willing to accept a discount for high volume business.

  • source
  • parent