Many of them I think see women’s bodies as kind of treats that they’re entitled to access to
That's a very uncharitable interpretation, I don't believe that it's true at all. I will give them the benefit of the doubt, even if they did not afford us any.
Ultimately, I think that their position aligns with the petty-bourgeois aspects of many Anarchist tendencies, which is predictable and expected when you have a "big tent" leftist community.
Rather than the focus on the sex trade as a whole, and the conditions and relations of overwhelming majority of sex workers around the world, their analysis centres around petty-bourgeois sex workers, mainly in the global north, even if they don't realise it. The concept of "I'm free to do what I want with my body", and thus abolishing the concept of sex work, of having to sell sexual services for money, is infringing on individual freedom.
They would argue that no one should have to sell sexual services for money, but they should be able to if they want to, and this is the part that shows their indifference to and detachment from the material reality of the sex trade in most of the world.
I'm not going to rehash the entire argument, but this is a much more sober and charitable interpretation of their position. It still does not justify their slander against us in any way, and ironically, I can turn around and call them SWERFS and chauvinists since their position on the issue is harmful to the vast majority of people in the sex trade.
It's not something I would do, because I don't believe having an incorrect analysis in good faith makes you a bigot, it just makes you incorrect.