▲ 357 ▼ Bill Clinton's Turn To Finger-Wag... (thelemmy.club) submitted 7 months ago by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (3 children) It's a nice tweet and I agree with it but I'd rather he was testifying about what he did on Epstein's island permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* I would like him to testify in front of competent people. I mean with the republican party questioning him do you really think they're going to ask him anything interesting when so many many answers would likely be: "Hey I was there with half your political party, just ask the president and all your colleages who were there." I do hope the contempt goes through because if it goes to an actual court you might get some names. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children) My prediction of his testimony of Epstein Island: "I saw, but I didn't partake." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago I saw, but I didn’t partake It's either that or just go in chains, like all politicians he's going to lie his ass off. Still a nice letter he put out there telling us to protest, i agree with that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Well his definition of having sex is when someone else finishes you. He doesn't believe it's sex if you finish yourself off. Nothing prior counts. So take that as you will. permalink fedilink source parent [–] slothrop@lemmy.ca [S] 5 points 7 months ago Just wait for the 'contempt' power play. If the House follows through, Clintons get discovery! Oops.... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* I would like him to testify in front of competent people. I mean with the republican party questioning him do you really think they're going to ask him anything interesting when so many many answers would likely be: "Hey I was there with half your political party, just ask the president and all your colleages who were there." I do hope the contempt goes through because if it goes to an actual court you might get some names. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children) My prediction of his testimony of Epstein Island: "I saw, but I didn't partake." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago I saw, but I didn’t partake It's either that or just go in chains, like all politicians he's going to lie his ass off. Still a nice letter he put out there telling us to protest, i agree with that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Well his definition of having sex is when someone else finishes you. He doesn't believe it's sex if you finish yourself off. Nothing prior counts. So take that as you will. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago I saw, but I didn’t partake It's either that or just go in chains, like all politicians he's going to lie his ass off. Still a nice letter he put out there telling us to protest, i agree with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago Well his definition of having sex is when someone else finishes you. He doesn't believe it's sex if you finish yourself off. Nothing prior counts. So take that as you will. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca [S] 5 points 7 months ago Just wait for the 'contempt' power play. If the House follows through, Clintons get discovery! Oops.... permalink fedilink source parent