you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Realistically? Never.

California is literally almost 10x the size and 7x the population of Denmark. And just the logistics of having to manage a dependency this large that's at least a 12 hour flight away would be a nightmare, both economic and organizational.

This would likely be one of the biggest dogs any tail has ever attempted to wag (certainly in modern times) besides the British rule of India, perhaps, and we all know how that turned out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You can be like Greenland and have autonomy. I think Denmark would be fine with a similar arrangement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    The problem is that Denmark would be responsible for defending it, and logistically, that would be a nightmare. There is basically no efficient way to ship an army there without crossing US-controlled territory, be it via land (impossible), sea (US took back control of the Panama canal, remember?), or air (minimum 12 hour nonstop flight, and that's only if you're crossing US airspace).

    On top of that, Denmark only has 6 Million people, so even if they shipped literally all of their soldiers there it probably wouldn't be enough to realistically hold it against a US invasion. Trump could simply order the US military to take it back and they'd likely finish the job in less than a week. Sure, Denmark could draw from the local population and invest in massive military training programs, but that would take years to accomplish and likely cost a good chunk of even their combined GDP (which they've already pledged to universal healthcare and a free Danish cookies).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    No. The US federal government does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    In this specific case, they're on nuke subs based out of San Diego. I'd say there's a coin flip chance a few of those stay on California's side in this ridiculously contrived fantasy scenario.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    In that case they maybe should take Florida, bulldoze it, and start over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Florida would certainly be a lot more realistic (shorter land border, much easier to reach by sea and air without having to cross US territory). Still 4x the size of Denmark however. Would definitely be a stretch, although not quite as huge as California.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    I thought that India thing was going well. I’ve been reading news papers in order of date from the first one so I’m current on June 23rd 1757. Let’s just have a look-see

    Oh… my god…

  • source
  • parent
  • The British ran India without even a phone line to convey policy. I believe with the modern internet it'd be easily doable.

    Currently America is run by like 8 or so billionaires, so the whole Danish parliament should have no trouble with just California.

  • source
  • parent