you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 57 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Can't believe another anti-vax guy was killed by a preventable and treatable condition. Prostate cancer is one of the more survivable forms of cancer (10-year relative survival rate of 98% with proper treatment). I wonder if he did the fruit juice enemas like Steve Jobs or he just tried to Straight Edge his way through it, because he didn't want to live with Low T.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    I looked it up after reading this comment

    He says he tried Ivermectin to treat his cancer lol. Npr article about it, says he didn’t discuss any specifics of his treatment other than that

    Edit: newer article indicates he eventually did seek actual treatment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    He probably sought actual treatment too late. Prostate cancer that is caught early enough is basically a non-issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Think it depends. Like a lot of other cancer stuff, there's variability. Most of the common prostate cancer is that easy and in fact they don't even treat it. My wife's grandfather was told they would basically do nothing until it started getting bad., and he died of unrelated heart failure years later without his cancer progressing.

    Sounds like his was not so livable. Also unclear if he tried ivermectin instead of traditional treatment, or as an additional hail Mary. I've known people who had cancer and they tried anything and everything alongside their treatment, in case anything would help. I also knew one guy that thought just vitamin c would cure his cancer and declined any other treatment, and got killed by what may have been a supremely treatable cancer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I think that's because prostate cancer can be slow spreading and at advanced age (70s 80s) you have much more chance of dying from something else before it becomes an issue so why risk the surgery. In your 50s or 60s it's a whole different calculation.

  • source
  • parent