1043
Smooth sloperator (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://mstdn.social/@vonExplaino/115727253379148743

Screenshot of a mastodon post by @vonExplaino@mstdn.social: No. you're not a "prompt engineer", you're a sloperator.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

Maybe accepted but still inaccurate, it's a simulation, not a proper artificial network, which, by definition, would be a proper "hardware".
And for the "artificial" term, I don't know, everything humanity does is artificial, so it's a bit superfluous.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    Not sure these definitions are any better. Why is hardware proper by definition? And where is the software delineation? Would an fpga be hardware or software? How would this differ from our own neurons in that how they fire versus what they do is ill defined? I think trying to pin down where computational work is done biologically is a bit of a pointless exercise right now. Similarly trying to pin out definitions we use in computer science to match those ill understood biological constraints is also premature general ai using non biological computation may end up being vastly different from biology.

    And traditionally we just call things a neural network artificial is implied give we are running on a digital computer.

    Also the statement everything humanity does being artificial is needlessly broad. I don’t think you could argue reproduction of humans is artificial.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent