you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hot take: ...but it's just fucking gaming tho... He's not fucking with manifesting some bullshit ideology throughout the world, he's not trying to leave his mark on history... And if he is, it's as a chill dude who gave us all a better alternative to piracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago

    he’s not trying to leave his mark on history

    He kind of is, but in the way old-school millionaires did - he has purchased a MASSIVE yacht and turned it into an ocean-floor research laboratory, either donated it to a university, or just allows researchers to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago*

    Gabe was already wealthy with Microsoft money when he founded Valve, so when his new private startup found success he didn't feel the pressure to go public, expand, dilute, and cash out. He made the judgement call that they already had enough talent internally to keep playing the hits while keeping all the profit for themselves, and he was right. I'm sure a little bit a business ideology reinforces Gabe's long-term outlook for Valve, but he's ultimately enabled by a happy intersection of pre-existing wealth, great timing, and careful hiring choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, he is developing the brain chip with his Starfish Neuroscience company but its supposed to be minimally invasive and let's be real if its between his and Elon Musks (which is NOT minimally invasive and requires surgical implantation) I'm definitely going with his.

    I wouldn't say at this point its all about gaming though. Valve is, but not necessarily Gabe. Which I don't mind but I could understand how some people wouldn't like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Fair. But its important to point out this won't be one that goes inside you it will be one that you put on the outside of your head that interacts with brain impulses, at least according to them.

    If I was someone with limited mobility or some other sort of handicap I would do that before I got the one that goes inside my skull. But that's just me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    You know, I think those are inevitable ... any potentially evil technology shown in sci-fi will eventually be created irl; it's like some kind of rule (trust me). Given this, the future is a duality: it's either GabeN or a random billionaire. I want this potentially-abusive technology with devil that I know.

  • source
  • parent