I'm just really not a fan of timed assessments in general. I don't think putting most people in a position where they're forced to fight the clock to come up with answers yields a good measure of their understanding or ability of most things. I've always been much more inclined to give things as take-home assignments (essays, exams, etc.) with a few days to ruminate on things. Unfortunately, the emergence of LLMs has made this a challenge as well.

I agree that anyone who needs added time on an assessment should have it. However, if your assessment is designed such that almost everyone needs more time, you have a bad assessment. There's a lot of that out there, though, which then both penalizes people who didn't jump through the hoops to get extra time and unfairly advantages folks who don't generally need added time but got it anyway to have a cushion. I have seen many, many students who absolutely will take every second they're allotted on an in-class assessment even though they definitely don't need it (this is true even for lots of students who don't have accommodations).