Wait, so you think its okay to use the bullshit machine for mission critical work, but when its something completely non-consequential like your strawman college student who managed to get a degree and get hired by you using AI, thats when theres a problem???

If I found out my fucking doctor was using this LLM bullshit to diagnose me, im getting the fuck out and finding another doctor because that tells me I might as well be diagnosing myself using chatgpt.

Your false equivalency argument is failing you tremendously, not to mention the fact you brought this up for absolutely no reason other than to stir shit up. Students using AI has nothing to do with the University or College stealing money from students and replacing professors with AI. One falls on a large respected organization. The other falls on Billy Schmoe who any hiring manager could look at and know won't be a good fit.

Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well.

Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students.

In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad)

In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort.