▲ 444 ▼ College Students Furious When Their Course Is Taught by AI Instead of a Professor (futurism.com) submitted 10 months ago by ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social [M] to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (5 children) Lets be real you wouldn't. $2K is a lot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well. Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students. In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad) In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well. Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students. In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad) In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Even following that logic, putting in effort to learn hallucinated material will not result well. Let me clarify, we should ask for both. We should want non-AI professors AND non-cheating students. In the failure of second case, a good 96% of students are wrong by the end of the semester. (Yes cheating in CS is that bad) In the failure of first case, EVERY student is wrong by the end of the semester. Even the ones that put in effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MourningDove@lemmy.zip -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent