I want to let people know why I'm strictly against using AI in everything I do without sounding like an 'AI vegan', especially in front of those who are genuinely ready to listen and follow the same.

Any sources I try to find to cite regarding my viewpoint are either mild enough to be considered AI generated themselves or filled with extremist views of the author. I want to explain the situation in an objective manner that is simple to understand and also alarming enough for them to take action.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah the wording on this is wrong. The closest adjacent (honest) question would be "how can I appear to be arguing in good faith when I have a predetermined position on this technology?".

EDIT:

I don't even like GenAI myself and that's how this comes off.

If you're looking for reasons: (1) sustainability / ecology, (2) market concentration, (3) intellectual theft, (4) mediocre output, (5) lack of guardrails, (6) vendor lock-in, (7) appears to drive some people insane, (8) drives down the quality of the Internet overall, (9) de-skills the people that use it, (10) produces probabilistic outputs and yet is used in applications that require deterministic outputs...I could go on for a while.

  • source
  • parent