this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025

651 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

programmer_humor@programming.dev

33,412 readers

6,724 active

902 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

functions (lemmy.ml)

submitted 10 months ago by cipherd@lemmy.ml to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/39334581

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 63 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Meanwhile Haskell:

=

hideshow 4 child comments

[+] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

The examples on the meme don't bind any variables. If those are lambdas, the Haskell version is just the ... part.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I mean if we are talking lambdas the kotlin would just be {}

parent

[–] andrybak@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

too bad they chose :: for type declaration instead of :

parent