▲ 205 ▼ The myth of "consensual" internet (thelemmy.club) submitted 10 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago (5 children) "AI" "art" which is neither permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children) AI being appropriated for neural nets which might even do things unrelated to what we think of as intelligence is annoying, I'll give you that. What art is is kind of a huge can of worms, though. In any case, it's pretty clear they can satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists, and that's where at least part of the butthurt comes from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kuori@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago (1 child) What art is is kind of a huge can of worms that's true but i'm passing positive that if you asked a hundred thousand people to define art not a single one would say something like [art is when an algorithm is able to] satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 10 months ago Agreed. The point being that people aren't really upset about whether it's art or not. They're mad about money. And that's not exactly dumb either, making bread is important. It'd just be nice if it was admitted to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 10 months ago (1 child) We have harnessed the power of intelligence in our own machines by replicating a part of the brain. The intelligence is artificial, making it "Artificial Intelligence". The name is exactly what it does. You claim to know that it can never be art? If art had limits, it wouldn't be art. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago I'm pretty sure most people would agree that art is the product of an artist, not just 'thing that looks nice' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children) AI being appropriated for neural nets which might even do things unrelated to what we think of as intelligence is annoying, I'll give you that. What art is is kind of a huge can of worms, though. In any case, it's pretty clear they can satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists, and that's where at least part of the butthurt comes from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kuori@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago (1 child) What art is is kind of a huge can of worms that's true but i'm passing positive that if you asked a hundred thousand people to define art not a single one would say something like [art is when an algorithm is able to] satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 10 months ago Agreed. The point being that people aren't really upset about whether it's art or not. They're mad about money. And that's not exactly dumb either, making bread is important. It'd just be nice if it was admitted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago (1 child) What art is is kind of a huge can of worms that's true but i'm passing positive that if you asked a hundred thousand people to define art not a single one would say something like [art is when an algorithm is able to] satisfy potential clients a lot better than human digital artists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 10 months ago Agreed. The point being that people aren't really upset about whether it's art or not. They're mad about money. And that's not exactly dumb either, making bread is important. It'd just be nice if it was admitted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 10 months ago Agreed. The point being that people aren't really upset about whether it's art or not. They're mad about money. And that's not exactly dumb either, making bread is important. It'd just be nice if it was admitted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 10 months ago (1 child) We have harnessed the power of intelligence in our own machines by replicating a part of the brain. The intelligence is artificial, making it "Artificial Intelligence". The name is exactly what it does. You claim to know that it can never be art? If art had limits, it wouldn't be art. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago I'm pretty sure most people would agree that art is the product of an artist, not just 'thing that looks nice' permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 1 point 10 months ago I'm pretty sure most people would agree that art is the product of an artist, not just 'thing that looks nice' permalink fedilink source parent
