you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

So then logically, she voted with her party after her husband both purchased and later sold stock at the exact correct times (by your own admission) to profit off things both coming and going.

And all of the rest of those listings are all... Just lucky. Over and over again.

And somehow, even without those listings, the performance of her portfolio is... Just a coincidence and shrewd trading at a level that outperforms everyone else thousands of times over.

Got it.

But yeah, everyone else is easily fooled by Trump somehow. In 2011. Where the investigation was carried out by 60 Minutes for some reason.

Brilliant deductive work.

This is some MAGA-level bending yourself into knots to suck yourself off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    This is some MAGA-level bending yourself into knots to suck yourself off.

    Welcome to Banjo, he is Blue MAGA. Pelosi can't do any wrong, woke leftists Russian backed leftists lied. Support my party or you're UNAMERICAN!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Selling a stock after holding it for exactly two days hardly constitutes a conspiracy, you're really grasping at straws with your "exact right time" assumption. You would have an easier time claiming VISA manipulated prices to make a bribe, but at the end of the day Nancy Pelosi voted and passed laws against monied interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (1 child)

    So then yes to everything I said before then. Yes it was all a coincidence. Yes it was sold at exactly the right time after purchasing it exactly the right point in a VERY tight period of time. Totally out of the blue. Several hundred times given her stock portfolio.

    Listen, if you're not even going to pretend to be believable, then I don't think we need to continue this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment