you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

This is a common strategy in competitive games. For example, in chess, it might greatly benefit you to hinder your opponent's pieces rather than improving one of your own pieces.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    It might make rational sense in zero sum games where there is a winner and loser (or a draw). But the real world is full of examples of less rational people who forgo an improvement in their own situation to worsen someone else's situation, to create negative-sum competitive plays in a world where positive-sum collaboration is actually possible.

  • source
  • parent