you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

It's generative AI though, not creative. It can literally only create what it's seen before. It's incapable of being original. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Andy Warhol painted soup cans. But anyone who expects inspiration and creativity from generative AI doesn't understand the technology as it's applied...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    It generates new content based on what is trained on. not just what is trained on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Where is the new part coming from? The new part can only come from combining things it already knows.

    And even that is the part that is already provided by the human as part if the prompt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Just like it can Hallucinate text, it also hallucinates content. That's a core part of the generative feature

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It hallucinates from incorrectly putting other info in its network together. It is all just stochastics.

    That is not original or new its is the core of what slop is.

    The problem is that it does not have a goal or even just understands why it is doing what it is doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    If you know what a ice sculpture of a human looks like and you know what an ice sculputre of a swan looks like you can maybe infer what an "ice sculpture of a flying crocodile with wings" might look like too, by combining what you already know. It's as much incorrect as your imagination, no?

  • source
  • parent