you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Short version: unchecked capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    But I was told that capitalism checks itself using something called “market forces”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago*

    Hey now, those “market forces” are actually the work of the wonderful ‘Invisible Hand’! Which is of course the work of God and is definitely not being manipulated by all those billionaires behind the curtain over there…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Imagine a war against an enemy with known lead poisoning.

    That would probably be an easy win

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    They poisoned themselves with shit from pet stores and farm supplies. They sent death threats to the guy who told them not to inject bleach.
    Individually, they may be easy to beat, but as a group they are worse than a zombie apocalypse

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah. Those problems totally didn't exist before capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Not all at once, no. Fascism didn't even exist until the 1920s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Fascism is a modern iteration of an old problem. Not even the worst version of it. Plenty of theocracies and empires in history promoted similar strong group/national identity paired with subjugation of individuals to an authoritarian state.

    And fascism is not even compatible with capitalism as it requires state control over industry. It would be more compatible with socialism except that it's not nationalizing industry for the benefit of the working class explicitly, just the benefit of the nation/state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Capitalism is also a modern interpretation of an old problem. The idea of material wealth determining worth and power. That's largely how "might makes right" works with a more economic flavor.

    If you think you can't have state control in capitalism you haven't been paying attention. China is capitalist country with tons of government controls. They can throw a "communist" label on it, but that have little to no actual communist/socialist ideology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    When the state fully controls your property, it's not private property and thus not capitalistism. It's not socialism either, because they still give deference to the original "private" owner.

    China is a perfect example of how a fascist country would operate, honestly. It's frankly annoying that people don't routinely call it a fascist state and instead call it communist.

  • source
  • parent